Mass Genocide in the Bible
This is one of the ten most viewed posts of all time. To read all ten, download this free e-book.
Although it is rarely taught in Sunday School, there can be no doubt that mass genocide occurs with alarming regularity in the Old Testament. Just crack open a copy of Michael Earl’s self-published wonder Bible Stories Your Parents Never Taught You and read a few chapters. Over and over again, Israel kills not just the soldiers of the territory they invade, but the women and children, too.
All of this takes place at the behest of God himself, who is the one that orders the killings to take place. God very often indicates that he wants no survivors left.
This, according to our most scathing critics, leaves a huge moral dilemma: how can we continue to call the Bible the “Good Book” if it contains more violence than the average video game? Was the bloodshed and violence necessary?
First understand where I’m coming from. All authority comes from God first. That leaves God as the ultimate authority in this universe. This means that there is no higher court of appeals. Any authority we exercise is a microcosmic reflection of the authority that God has granted us.
Second, the Bible is clear that the penalty for sin is death (see Gen 2:15-17 and Rom 6:14). Now that we have God as established as the ultimate authority and the penalty for sin established as death, let’s look at who is actually innocent before God.
According to Paul, no one is innocent before God. He establishes that the Gentiles are guilty in Romans 1, then tells the Jewish people that they are no better in Romans 2. Then he establishes that, while the Jews are under the Law, the Gentiles are a Law unto themselves, and both Jew and Gentile fail to live up to either the Mosaic Law or the natural order. That is where he makes the concluding proclamation that “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” in Romans 3:23.
So, if the Jews fail to follow the Mosaic Law, and the Gentiles fail to follow the natural order of things, and Paul can confidently declare that we all fall short of God’s glory, what follows? Most people don’t like to admit this, but the only conclusion one can possibly draw from this data is that we all deserve to die.
Whether that death comes to us peacefully at the end of a long and fulfilling life, suddenly in a car crash, or at the end of an Israelite’s sword because we occupied the Promised Land, we all deserve it. That’s all of us–combatants, women, children, and even infants. No one is innocent in the sight of God, we have all sinned and fall short of his glory.
But wait–it hardly seems fair, does it? Especially to the infant who has no chance to repent of his nature yet. But this life is no guarantee. Any of us could die at anytime. Death comes to us all–it is absolutely unavoidable. What we need to keep in mind, at this point in our history, is that we thank God not because he is fair, but because he is merciful. We’ll return to that point in a minute.
I want to spend a minute on this point because it seems to stick in the minds of so many critics of Christianity. How can an infant deserve death?
Since the vast majority (probably over 90%) of these critics are pro-choice (that is, in favor of abortion), it’s hypocritical to even raise this sort of objection. It’s okay when a mother ends her own child’s life in utero, but it’s not okay for God to order the death of an infant? God is sovereign over the lives of humans and is justified in ordering the end of any life because he can give it back. No mortal can do that.
Somehow, I am accused of having twisted morals to accept God’s decree that even the infants shall die in the divinely commanded genocides, but the people who believe strongly in abortion are perfectly moral in believing that a mother can choose to end her own child’s life for any reason.
It’s tempting to argue that sometimes abortions happen because the pregnancy is a danger to the life of the mother. I’m fine with that. Sometimes incest is involved. I’m shakier on that, but I can still accept it (however begrudgingly). In the case of rape, adoption is the more merciful solution. We can’t just focus on the woman who was raped here, we also have to determine what is best for the child as well. Both parties have a right to life, and if the woman would prefer not to raise a child of rape, then give the child to someone who will love him/her. That said, I would not stand in the way of a rape victim who went that route–neither would I judge her–but I would strongly discourage her.
I’m not a black-and-white pro-life activist. I think there are cases where abortion should be an available option.
But let’s cut the crap. We all know that most abortions are not in the cases of life-or-death, incest, or rape. Those are the ultra-rare exceptions. Most abortions are for convenience. Most abortions happen because the mother or father either don’t want to raise a child, they wanted the opposite sex of what the ultrasound is showing, or the baby tested positive for a genetic abnormality that means he will burden the parents for longer than they want. This is not a valid objection.
Leaving the hypocrisy aside, let’s move from abstract philosophy into actual history. These genocides didn’t happen. There were three commanded genocides: Midianites (Num 31), Canaanites (starting in Josh 10), and the Amalekites (1 Sam 15). In each case, we clearly see that in later historical books, the culture and the people exist and are in tact. The Midianites opposed Gideon in Judges 6-7, the Amalekites later in 1 Samuel (28), and Jesus healed a Canaanite woman in Matthew 15!
God commanding the Israelite army in the way that he did is similar to the head coach of a football team pumping up his players for a tough game. God is trying to inspire them, to invigorate them. They didn’t take this command at face value, since clearly the cultures still existed long after the supposed genocides took place.
Even so, this does not contradict a God of mercy because mercy by its very nature is selective. God has chosen to mercy his elect, and calls them according to his purpose.
To address the lingering question of why God ordered the deaths of so many people, I reiterate that these people were not innocent before God. This was God’s judgment upon them for their sins. Their sin was worshiping other deities and not seeking after the One True God.
In this day of religious freedom and pluralism, it seems totally barbaric that God would destroy people for simply not believing that he is the True God. After all, have we not the right to choose our own religion? In the United States, we do. But in God’s mind, we have no right to choose our religion. He is to be worshiped, and him alone. He created us and endowed us with the responsibility to seek his will and worship him.
It seems foreign to our sensibilities, but it isn’t. Even in the progressive, enlightened United States, it is a crime punishable by death to betray the State. It’s called treason. This is exactly how to view not seeking the True God. By not putting God in his proper place–first among all things–and instead seeking nature the way that many scientists do or other gods the way many religions do, we are committing treason.
The objection of geographically inherited religion creeps in here. True, most people learn the religion of their parents and then move on with their lives. But that fact doesn’t absolve us of a duty to find out the truth. That few people do is hardly an argument against God.
The fact is we neither worship nor seek God, as the apostle Paul has already noted in the first three chapters of Romans. Since I’ve already established that it is sinful not to seek God and that none of us seek God, I can conclude easily that we all deserve the penalty for that sin. What is the penalty for sin? Death.
If God were fair, then all of us should die in our sins and that would be that. Fortunately for us, God has created a path by which we can be saved from our sins. God isn’t being fair; he’s being merciful. The path which he created is Jesus Christ. Repent and follow Christ, and God will have mercy on your soul. You won’t get you deserve; you’ll instead get what you don’t deserve–eternal life in heaven.
What does that mean for the mass genocides recorded in the Bible? Unfortunately for those poor souls, God was being fair rather than merciful. They got the punishment that they deserved for the sins they committed. Remember, “poor” does not mean “innocent.” No one is innocent before God.
This is part of the gospel message–that you are a sinner in need of being saved. That many churches fail to teach this is alarming. But it is a symptom of our highly individualistic culture. People believe that they are basically good, and that they deserve heaven. They think that they start with an “A” in life and that the bad things that they do take points away from their final grade from God. This is the reason that people read a story like the slaughter of the Midianites and think that those “poor souls” didn’t deserve to die.
The truth is that everyone starts with an F. Only faith in Christ can earn you a better grade.
Posted on March 4, 2009, in Book Review, God, Morality, Sin, Theology and tagged Sin. Bookmark the permalink. 10 Comments.
If you are to believe the original story of God vs the Serpent in the Garden of Eden, God doesn’t want us to have morality and the Serpent does. So, wouldn’t it make sense that God would give laws that aren’t so great on purpose to confuse our sense of morality and take away the morality the Serpent convinced us to steal from God by eating the fruit? Wouldn’t that explain why ceremonial observances (like Sabbaths, sacrifices, kosher-laws, and no mixing of linen and wool in the same outfit, etc.) are placed on a par with moral commandments like “thou shalt not commit adultery”? Is the point to make people say “sure adultery is wrong, but so is eating shellfish” so they can then confuse and destroy morality? Is this God’s strategy to take back what we “stold” in the Garden under the instigation of the Serpent?
And if this is the case, then the constant OKaying of genocide is clearly part of the agenda of divine retribution of stealing morality back from us. By commanding us to commit genocide, doesn’t the deity nullify that which we took when we ate the fruit, that which he didn’t want us to have but the Serpent did?
Now, you will say “the serpent is the devil!!! he’s bad!!!” Maybe according to the LAST book in the Bible, but not according to the FIRST! Genesis 3:1 says “Now the serpent was more crafty than any other wild animal that the LORD God had made.” So, he’s not he devil; he’s just an animal that can talk. Wow! And an animal recognized that man needed morality, while God didn’t? Interesting!
Now, look how smart this animal is! He said to the woman, “Did God say, ‘You shall not eat from any tree in the garden’? You will not die; for God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”
Was he right or was he right? They didn’t die that day (just 1000 years later!). And guess what, they’re eyes were opened and they knew good and evil (Gen 3:7) and God himself even says “See, the man has become like one of us, knowing good and evil;” (Gen 3:22)!!! So, clearly, God lied and the serpent (just a talking animal) called him on it. The serpent also sacrificed himself for the good of mandkind!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Of course, you can disprove all that by showing that morality is bad for mankind, and that we’d be better off being genocidal maniacs.
Oh, and Adam and Eve were not the only human beings, because in Genesis 1 God created the whole race “male and female” then in chapter 2 he created two more specimens to put in the Garden of Eden. So, outside the Garden, the Neanderthals were already killing eating one another. When Adam and Eve were expelled from the Garden, therefore, and mixed genetically with that external mass of humanity, they genetically passed morality into their genes.
LOL when I was a kid I always used to wonder. I thought that Adam and Eve were the only humans made and the when they are cast out of the garden, all of a sudden there are so many other people. LOL the mind of a child can be a very interesting place.
If even infants are guilty before God, then God’s a nut. Many, why did I come up with this stupid doctrine back in the 380s? Look how these fools are still teaching it!
Allah Akbar! See, I’m right, Allah really does hate infidels. Finally a Christian who knows the truth, that Allah really is a brutal dictator who commands the destruction of all infidels and their brood. Cory Tucholski, you have been added to the protected scrolls.
No wonder the UN is having such a hard time finding you, Osama bin Laden! Your I.P. address has you in Indianapolis, IN. I will notify the proper authorities immediately.
Pingback: Deconversion Story « Josiah Concept Ministries
Pingback: Harris & Russell Make a big Mistake « Josiah Concept Ministries
Pingback: Eternal Security « Josiah Concept Ministries
Pingback: 40 Questions to Ask Christians: Communication with God | Josiah Concept Ministries