Fifth Marian Dogma Letter
Five Roman Catholic Cardinals have written a letter to the other members of the College of Cardinals urging additional support in the form of signatures asking Pope Benedict XVI to define the fifth and final Marian dogma. The suggested wording is thus:
Jesus Christ, the Redeemer of man, gave to humanity from the Cross his mother Mary to be the spiritual Mother of all peoples, the Co-redemptrix, who under and with her Son cooperated in the Redemption of all people; the Mediatrix of all graces, who as Mother brings us the gifts of eternal life; and the Advocate, who presents our prayers to her Son.
Let’s back up a second. The four Marian dogmas that are already defined are the Divine Motherhood, the Perpetual Virginity, the Immaculate Conception, and the Assumption. The Divine Motherhood means Mary is called the Mother of God, or theotokos in the Greek. The Perpetual Virginity means that Mary remained a virgin before, during and after the birth of Christ. The Immaculate Conception means she was born without sin. And the Assumption means that she was taken into heaven body and soul.
Now the Cardinals wish to define Mary as Co-redemptrix, which recognizes the unique role that she plays in the salvation of man. Many people think that this a new teaching of the Catholic Church, but in reality it isn’t. Dave Armstrong obligingly demonstrates that for us in this article. This, in fact, has been the teaching of the Catholic Church for a very long time.
As Mediatrix of all graces, the Church will recognize that God’s grace flows to man through Mary. She will also be defined as Advocate, which means that she presents the prayers of the faithful to her Son. Armstrong argues that the world isn’t ready for these titles to be dogmatically defined because of the misunderstanding that they wrought. I agree that they shouldn’t be defined, but for far different reasons than DA has given.
These titles detract from the singular glory of Jesus Christ. Let’s look first at Mediatrix of all graces. Grace flows not from Mary, but from God. Not from God then to Mary then to us, but from God to us. The Scriptures are very clear on this point: “And God is able to make all grace abound to you, so that having all sufficiency in all things at all times, you may abound in every good work” (2 Cor 9:
and “For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God” (Eph 2:8). Grace is God’s gift to us. Period.
Advocate also detracts from the singular glory of Christ, for it is He that mediates prayers, not Mary to Him. “[T]here is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus” (1 Tim 2:5).
Finally, the letter to the Hebrews makes it abundantly clear that only one person could have made the ultimate sacrifice that pleased God and made atonement for the sins of mankind. Only one person could “save to the uttermost those who draw near to God through him” (Heb 7:25)
For it was indeed fitting that we should have such a high priest, holy, innocent, unstained, separated from sinners, and exalted above the heavens. He has no need, like those high priests, to offer sacrifices daily, first for his own sins and then for those of the people, since he did this once for all when he offered up himself. For the law appoints men in their weakness as high priests, but the word of the oath, which came later than the law, appoints a Son who has been made perfect forever. (Heb 7:26-2
![]()
Mary can’t do this for us. Only Jesus can be this high priest, superior to the earthly priests, who is “holy, innocent, unstained, separated from sinners, and exalted above the heavens.” Mary is not that high priest, nor indeed can she be.









My first time to your site, from a google search on this topic. I understand your concern on this dogma detracting from the “singular glory of Jesus Christ.” As a former evangelical (BA in Theology from an AG college)I too would have felt somewhat uncomfortable with language like this. However, now that I am Catholic, and over the years as I’ve learned about Catholicism and Orthodoxy, I see these terms in a little different light.
The whole reason the RC and Orthodox faiths love Mary, and speak so highly of her like this, is because they are so crazy about her son. To us, doctrines about Mary in no way detract from her Son, in fact all the more they speak of how great He is. Jesus is truly the Son of God. Jesus is truly God in flesh, the 2nd person of the trinity. Jesus is truly our Savious, Redeemer, and Lord. And, without a doubt, Mary gave birth to Jesus. Without a mother, He could not have been born our redeemer. She has a special role in salvation, unique from you and I, in that she is His mother. As such, she plays a special part in salvation. We could not receive Gods grace from her alone, it is through her Son. However we could not have received her Son, without him having a mother. She is not just another woman among any possible women who could have given him birth. She is unique, and so she has this unique role in our history.
Grace comes form God alone, however that grace (Jesus) proceeded from a woman, his Mother. From her, we received the grace of God. To look at it another way, could the grace of God (Jesus) come to us without a mother? Or did the Father choose to send Christ without going through a woman? For this reason, because we so love and dedicate ourselves to ur son, do we appreciate her unique role.
Thank you for the topic, you raise points that need more dialouge. Hopefully this is an open forum and allows for that. Peace…