DA, as he is affectionately known to my fellow “anti-Catholic” apologists James Swan and James White, has now made two posts, here and here, in reference to this one post from me.

Two posts for the price of one?  Shucks, I don’t know what to say.  This post has quelled my fears about this little item, cited on Swan’s blog:

To the extent that I deal with anti-Catholics at all, I’ll stick to at least influential ones like James White. He affects a lot of people, and so, needs to be countered and refuted. But Swan is a lightweight in the anti-Catholic apologetic world. Let him write posts like this, then. I have better things to do than to waste my time reading them, let alone responding.

I was worried that DA wouldn’t respond to me anymore, even once I post my reply to the Vicar of Christ fiasco from the previous week.  Since, after all, if James Swan is a lightweight, then I must be sub-atomic-particle-weight.

But, I see that my mini-feud with Mr. Armstrong is still alive and well.  Perhaps it is because I’m keeping it more friendly and less drenched with sarcasm than Swan is?  Friendly theological debate is far more edifying and both parties stand to benefit from the interchange.  After all, I’ve learned about perichoresis from this debate and that has placed me in greater awe of God than I already was.  Concepts like perichoresis make me all that much more devoted to Him, solidify my trust in the gospel, and make me all the more willing to proclaim my faith to others.  Perichoresis shows how infinite God really is.

The fact that He is contained by nothing, but in fact contains everything, just leaves me in perfect wonder.  And I suppose I have Mr. Armstrong to thank for starting me on this journey, because if I had never happened upon the information in his blog, I would never have researched it to provide a proper response to his other musings.

I hope that I have, or will, benefit him in some small way as well.